MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393093616 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2024-6956

Abstract 6956: Role of soluble CD109 in the progression of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

2024· article· en· W4393093616 on OpenAlexaff
Varsha Reddy Durgempudi, Tenzin Kungyal, Anie Philip

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer-related gene regulation
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHead and neckBasal cellHead and neck squamous-cell carcinomaMedicineOncologyHead and neck cancerInternal medicineCancerSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: About five percent of global cancer deaths are attributed to Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC), and its annual incidence is predicted to skyrocket by thirty percent by 2030 (according to GLOBOCAN estimates). HNSCC originates from squamous cells in the oral cavity, lips, tongue, larynx, pharynx, and salivary glands. Despite the comparatively easy tumor diagnosis, the number of patients diagnosed at an advanced stage with metastatic spread is substantial. Multiple cell-signaling pathways have been proven to be dysregulated in HNSCC, including the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Our group has identified CD109, a GPI-anchored membrane-associated protein, as a TGF-β co-receptor that inhibits TGF-β signaling. CD109 expression is upregulated in SCC, and its elevated expression in premalignant lesions is associated with an increased risk of metastatic progression. Recent studies by our team have revealed that CD109 promotes tumor growth in vivo, likely by enhancing EGFR signaling. Interestingly, we have also discovered that membrane CD109 (mCD109) is endogenously released from the cell surface; however, the mechanism of action of the released/soluble form of CD109 (sCD109) remains unknown. In the current study, we examined whether sCD109 opposes the mCD109/EGFR-mediated pro-tumorigenic signaling and HNSCC progression. Research Questions: 1.Does sCD109 regulate EGF-induced EGFR signaling and downstream stem cell marker expression?2.Does sCD109 regulate EGFR expression levels on the HNSCC cell surface?3.Does sCD109 affect the nuclear localization of EGFR?4.Does sCD109 promote EGFR internalization and degradation? Methodology: HNSCC cells and patient-derived primary cells were treated with/without sCD109 recombinant protein (1nM, 5nM, and 10nM) without and with the EGF induction (10ng/ml for 15 mins) and were analyzed by western blotting, immunofluorescence, and immunocytochemistry. The role of sCD109 in regulating membrane EGFR levels was assessed by flow cytometry and surface protein biotinylation assay. Results: Our findings demonstrated that sCD109 inhibited EGF-induced phosphorylation of EGFR (Y1068), STAT3, AKT, and ERK. The sCD109 suppressed the stem cell marker expression (Nanog, OCT4, SOX2). Additionally, sCD109 hindered the nuclear localization of activated EGFR. The sCD109 decreased the membrane EGFR expression levels and activated the phosphorylation of EGFR (Y1045), suggesting a role for sCD109 in promoting EGFR degradation. Conclusion: Our team has previously reported that mCD109 is pro-tumorigenic, and our current findings suggest that sCD109 opposes the pro-tumorigenic effects of mCD109. This study aimed to determine how sCD109 regulates cellular signaling pathways and will provide key insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the progression of HNSCC, a highly prevalent malignancy. Citation Format: Varsha Reddy Durgempudi, Tenzin Kungyal, Anie Philip. Role of soluble CD109 in the progression of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6956.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.200

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer-related gene regulationFrench-language works237,207