MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393093781 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2024-2898

Abstract 2898: Development of the lipid kinase PIKfyve PROTAC degrader against neuroendocrine prostate cancer

2024· article· en· W4393093781 on OpenAlexaff
Yuanyuan Qiao, Chungen Li, Yang Zheng, Xia Jiang, Sarah Nicole Yee, Caleb Cheng, Yi Bao, Yuping Zhang, Yuzhuo Wang, Zhen Wang, Ke Ding, Arul M. Chinnaiyan

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Degradation and Inhibitors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancerProstate cancerProstateMedicineCancer researchInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Therapies targeting the androgen receptor (AR) as the main driver of prostate cancer (PCa) can lead to various mechanisms of resistance and promote progression to castration-resistant PCa (CRPC), which has a median survival of only 13-23 months. Amongst recurrent CRPC, 17%-30% of patients develop neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC), which is a PCa subtype characterized by a unique histology. NEPC exhibits a loss of AR signaling during neuroendocrine transdifferentiation which results in resistance to AR-targeted therapies and gain of cell characteristics resembling poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Despite advances in the understanding of NEPC development, treatment options remain limited, with platinum-based chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for both de novo and treatment-induced NEPC. However, response to first-line chemotherapy in NEPC is short, with a median survival of only seven months. The poor prognosis of NEPC is attributed in part to late diagnosis and a lack of effective therapeutic agents. Our previous work demonstrated that NEPC and AR-negative PCa exhibit higher dependency on the lipid kinase PIKfyve than AR-positive CRPC. Thus, development of PIKfyve inhibitory therapies targeting the emergent vulnerabilities of NEPC or AR-negative forms of PCa is a promising approach. Using a proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) technology, we designed a class of PIKfyve specific degrader. The in vitro degradation efficiency were determined by immunoblotting, and DC50s (degradation concentration at 50%) were calculated for top candidates. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic were evaluated for in vivo study. In summary, we have developed a class of PIKfyve specific degrader using the E3 ligase von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) as a ligand via a diverse set of linkers. Mechanistic studies revealed that it induced PIKfyve degradation in a VHL- and proteasome-dependent manner. Citation Format: Yuanyuan Qiao, Chungen Li, Yang Zheng, Xia Jiang, Sarah Nicole Yee, Caleb Cheng, Yi Bao, Yuping Zhang, Yuzhuo Wang, Zhen Wang, Ke Ding, Arul Chinnaiyan. Development of the lipid kinase PIKfyve PROTAC degrader against neuroendocrine prostate cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 2898.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicProtein Degradation and InhibitorsFrench-language works237,207