MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393095262 · doi:10.1093/gji/ggae115

Incorporating topographic effects in surface wave tomography based on shortest-path ray tracing

2024· article· en· W4393095262 on OpenAlexafffund
Nanqiao Du, Tingwei Yang, Tao Xu, Qinya Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Waves and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaK. C. Wong Education Foundation
KeywordsRay tracing (physics)TomographyGeologyDispersion (optics)Surface waveSurface (topology)Wave propagationGeodesyGeophysicsSeismologyGeometryOpticsPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY We propose a new method to obtain 3-D shear wave velocity structures for regions with undulating topography based on surface wave dispersion data. In our method, we assume that surface waves propagate along a curved free surface, and the dispersion effects of these waves can be modelled as a frequency-dependent ray tracing problem. We use the shortest-path method to address off-great-circle propagation arising from inhomogeneous elastic parameters and topographic variations. We then apply our method to both synthetic and real-data inversions and demonstrate that ignoring topographic effects may significantly distort the inverted images. Finally, we analysed the accuracy of our method and provided a rule-of-thumb principle to quantitatively assess the need to account for topographic effects in surface wave tomography for a region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.148
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicSeismic Waves and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207