Impaired autophagy flux contributes to enhanced ischemia reperfusion injury in the diabetic heart
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury is exacerbated in diabetic individuals and animal models. We tested whether autophagy is an important cellular determinant of cell death. First, we utilized a cellular model of hypoxia reoxygenation (H/R) in H9c2 cells cultured in low or high glucose (HG) and tested cell death using flow cytometry to detect Annexin-V and propidium iodide, imaging cell viability ReadyProbe and lactate dehydrogenase release. We observed that cell death induced by H/R was enhanced by HG. Kinetic analysis of caspase-3 activity using a fluorescence reporter probe, stable expression of the VC3AI biosensor and western blotting indicated that H/R induced activation of caspase-3 was enhanced by HG. Temporal autophagy flux analysis using DapRed and DalGreen probes indicated an initial increase in response to H/R that was reduced upon prolonged (24h) R. HG suppressed this induction of autophagy. This was verified using LC3 HiBiT reporter assay, tandem-fluorescent LC3, and western blotting. Lysosomal cathepsin activity was also elevated at 6h and suppressed at 24h R. Autophagy-deficient cells were generated via CRISPR-mediated knockout of atg7 and the effect of combined HG and H/R treatment on caspase activation and cell death was elevated in comparison with wild type cells. We then performed coronary artery ligation surgery to induce ischemia, followed by reperfusion, in wild-type or streptozotocin (STZ)-induced hyperglycemic mice. Non-invasive 3-dimensional imaging using fluorescence molecular tomography combined with computerized tomography was employed to monitor spatio-temporal activation of cardiac autophagy and apoptosis. Upon systemic injection of a near infra-red cathepsin activatable probe we found that hyperglycemic mice had lower activity in the infarct region after I/R versus wild type. In parallel, we observed a higher extent of I/R-induced apoptosis, detected with an annexin-V probe, in hyperglycemic mice. Collectively, these results revealed that impaired autophagic flux in the presence of high glucose levels exacerbates I/R injury.Abbreviation: satg7, autophagy-related 7; FMT, fluorescence molecular tomography; HG, high glucose; H/R, hypoxia/reoxygenation; I/R, ischemia/reperfusion; LC3, MAP1LC3; N, normoxia; NG, normal glucose; NIR, near-infrared; p62, SQSTM1; STZ, streptozotocin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".