MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393096647 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2024-6774

Abstract 6774: Establishment and optimization of an air liquid interface co-culture system to evaluate phenotypic changes in primary human Barrett's esophagus cells upon different environmental exposures

2024· article· en· W4393096647 on OpenAlexaff
Annesha Chatterjee, Jordana Maria Azevedo-Martins, Chira Chen Tanyolac, Qurat Ul Ain, Hui Yu, Sophie Camilleri‐Broët, Lorenzo Ferri, Philippe Gascard, Thea D. Tlsty, Matthew D. Stachler

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Canadian institutionsMontreal General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterface (matter)PhenotypeEsophagusLiquid cultureMedicinePrimary (astronomy)PathologyChemistryInternal medicineBiologyBiochemistryPhysicsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is a deadly cancer with an increasing incidence which arises out of it's precancerous precursor, termed Barrett’s esophagus (BE). A better understanding of the factors that influence BE progression is essential for early detection and novel therapeutics. 3D Air Liquid Interface (ALI) cultures provide an edge over traditional 2D cultures as they better mimic the in vivo conditions of the esophagus. The aim of the study was to establish conditions for a BE ALI model and to evaluate the phenotypic and molecular changes in primary human BE cells upon interaction with different types of esophageal fibroblasts (EF) and exposure to bile acids(BA) (a major component of gastroesophageal reflux). ALI conditions that allowed growth of both primary BE and fibroblast for at least 30 days were optimized. Non dysplastic BE cells from two patients were utilized with one having EAC (P) and the other with no history of progression (NP). The BE cells were cultured in our ALI model with 3 types of EFs: normal esophageal fibroblasts(NFs), BE associated fibroblasts(BFs) and EAC associated fibroblasts(CFs). To determine the effect of BA exposure, ALI cultures underwent daily 1 hour exposure to bile salts. To determine if BE cells that lacked p53 responded differently to BA exposure, CRISPR Cas9 was utilized to knockout TP53. ALI cultures were conducted for 28 days. Phenotypic differences were determined by H&E staining and immunofluorescence (IF). Changes in cell proliferation was evaluated by Ki67 IF. Successful ALI cultures were validated by positive expression of laminin, pan-cytokeratin, Muc2 and Muc5ac by IF. Upon co-culture, we observed opposing histologic changes in the BE cells from the P and NP patients. The NP BE cells had a less complex structure upon culture with the BFs and CFs compared to NFs. The P BE cells showed the development of a complex morphology upon culture with the CFs compared to the BFs and the NFs. In both patients, we observed an increase in Ki67 positivity with fibroblast co culture; NFs (NP: 6.91%, p=0.070, P: 10.6%, p=0.001), BFs (NP: 12.49%, p=0.0001, P: 11.196%, p=0.003) and CFs (NP: 19.88%, p<0.0001, P:14.63 %, p=0.0001) compared to no fibroblasts (NP = 5.32%, P= 7.25% Ki67+). Co-culture with CFs increased Ki67 staining compared to either NFs or BFs (p=0.007,0.014). Exposure to BA showed a thinning but intact BE epithelial surface in both patients with and without TP53 knockout. Overall, primary BE cells and fibroblasts can be maintained long term in an ALI culture and co-culture with fibroblasts drive increased proliferation in BE cells. The histology changes observed in NP and P cell could be an indication of possible activation and interaction of differential signaling pathways. Ongoing studies aim to identify these pathways and determine transcriptional changes due to co-culture and BA exposure. Citation Format: Annesha Chatterjee, Jordana Maria Azevedo-Martins, Chira Chen Tanyolac, Qurat-Ul Ain, Hui Yu, Sophie Camilleri-Broet, Lorenzo Ferri, Philippe Gascard, Thea D. Tlsty, Matthew D. Stachler. Establishment and optimization of an air liquid interface co-culture system to evaluate phenotypic changes in primary human Barrett's esophagus cells upon different environmental exposures [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6774.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.468

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineFrench-language works237,207