MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393116823 · doi:10.30737/jubitar.v2i1.1666

PENGARUH PEMBERIAN DAUN PEPAYA TERHADAP KELANCARAN PRODUKSI ASI PADA IBU NIFAS

2021· article· id· W4393116823 on OpenAlexaff
Nara Lintan Mega Puspita, Galuh Pradian Yanuaringsih, Mayasari Putri Ardela

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Bidan Pintar · 2021
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFood and Agricultural Sciences
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Air Susu Ibu (ASI) adalah makanan terbaik untuk bayi karena merupakan makanan alamiah yang sempurna, mudah dicerna oleh bayi, mengandung zat gizi yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan bayi untuk pertumbuhan, kekebalan dan mencegah berbagai penyakit. Dari hasil studi pendahuluan ibu postpartum (64,28%) di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Kota Wilayah Selatan Kota Kediri mengalami masalah pengeluaran ASI. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengetahui Pengaruh Pemberian Daun Pepaya Terhadap Kelancaran Produksi ASI Pada Ibu Nifas Di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Kota Wilayah Selatan Kota Kediri.Rancangan penelitian yang digunakan adalah pre eksperimental. Populasi yang diteliti seluruh ibu nifas di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Kota Wilayah Selatan Kota Kediri yang pengeluaran ASI tidak lancar. Menggunakan teknik purposive sampling, dengan responden berjumlah 16. Instrumen penelitian lembar observasi. Analisis data dengan uji Wilcoxon.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan 12 dari 16 responden yang daun pepaya pengeluaran ASI menjadi lancar . Hasil analisis ρ value 0,001 < 0,05 yang artinya ada pengaruh pemberian daun pepaya terhadap kelancaran produksi ASI pada ibu nifas di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Kota Wilayah Selatan Kota Kediri.Diharapkan dengan hasil penelitian ini pemberian daun pepaya terhadap kelancaran produksi ASI dapat menjadi alternatif menangani ASI tidak lancar.Â

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Bidan PintarSame topicFood and Agricultural SciencesFrench-language works237,207