Analysis of Factors Affecting the Severity of Injuries in Electric Two‐Wheeled Vehicle Crashes with or without Violation: A Random Parametric Logit Model considering Heterogeneity of Means and Variances
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electric two‐wheeled vehicle is one of the main commuting tools in China, but they are also more likely to have violations of the road group. In order to study the effect of the presence of violation on the severity of road traffic crashes among electric two‐wheeler riders, in this study, the effects of rider characteristics, road characteristics, collision characteristics, and environmental characteristics on the severity of injuries of electric two‐wheeled vehicle riders were considered separately analyzed based on the data of 6403 two‐wheeled electric vehicle traffic crashes in a region of Shandong Province from 2015 to 2021, and a random parametric logit model considering the heterogeneity of the mean and the variance (RP‐HMV logit) was established based on the presence or absence of violation behaviors of riders, respectively, in order to explore unobserved heterogeneity. In order to test the validity of the model for modeling the injury severity of pedestrians riding electric two‐wheelers, multinomial logit (MN‐logit model), and random parameter logit model (RP‐logit) were estimated, and the results showed that the RP‐HMV logit model was significantly superior in terms of goodness of fit. The study showed that some of the factors differed somewhat between the two scenarios, such as gender, while the factors that were significant in both scenarios were >60, broken pavement, street lights at night, no street lights at night, mixed motorized and nonmotorized lanes, sidewalks, other angles, no control, severe weather, and visibility <200 m, where the severe weather and visibility <200 m were random parameters obeying normal distributions, there is a significant difference between having street lights and no control at night in both scenarios, and the difference is significant. The results of the study can provide a reference for the development of targeted countermeasures to improve the traffic safety of electric two‐wheeled vehicles in China.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".