Modeling and optimization of the hybrid flow shop scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The hybrid flow shop scheduling problem (HFSP) is an extension of the classic flow shop scheduling problem and widely exists in real industrial production systems. In real production, sequence-dependent setup times (SDST) are very important and cannot be neglected. Therefore, this study focuses HFSP with SDST (HFSP-SDST) to minimize the makespan. To solve this problem, a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model to obtain the optimal solutions for small-scale instances is proposed. Given the NP-hard characteristics of HFSP-SDST, an improved artificial bee colony (IABC) algorithm is developed to efficiently solve large-sized instances. In IABC, permutation encoding is used and a hybrid representation that combines forward decoding and backward decoding methods is designed. To search for the solution space that is not included in the encoding and decoding, a problem-specific local search strategy is developed to enlarge the solution space. Experiments are conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the MILP model and IABC. The results indicate that the proposed MILP model can find the optimal solutions for small-scale instances. The proposed IABC performs much better than the existing algorithms and improves 61 current best solutions of benchmark instances.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".