An improved iterated greedy algorithm for distributed mixed no-wait permutation flowshop problems with makespan criterion
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The distributed permutation flowshop scheduling is a critical issue in various industries, involving jobs allocation and scheduling among multiple flowshops. This paper extends the research to explore the Distributed Mixed No-Wait Permutation Flowshop Scheduling Problems (DMNWPFSP) with minimizing makespan. The innovation lies in an optimized mathematical model, hybrid heuristic algorithms, an improved iterated greedy algorithm (IIG), and high-quality solutions. Extensive experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed IIG in terms of scheduling quality, computational efficiency, and robustness compared to existing approaches. The outcomes of this work contribute to the field of distributed flowshop scheduling, providing valuable insights for practitioners seeking to enhance production efficiency and competitiveness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it