A study on the nonlinear relationship between market, subsidy, and income of photovoltaic enterprises based on chaos theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the annual promotion of the international “dual carbon” goals, countries attach great importance to the development and innovation of clean energy. The United States, Japan, and China have all created many policies for the research and market development of photovoltaic energy. This article incorporates market dynamic regulation capability into a two-dimensional system of government subsidy policies and photovoltaic revenue, constructs a three-dimensional dynamic nonlinear model based on market dynamic regulation capability, government subsidies, and enterprise revenue, and numerically simulates and analyzes the impact of parameter and initial value changes in the equation on enterprise revenue. The market dynamic regulation capability is obtained from Chaotic attractors and dynamic evolution graphs of the nonlinear evolution between government subsidies and corporate profits in different scenarios. Research has shown that: (1) Rapidly improving the dynamic regulation ability of the market cannot continuously increase the revenue of the photovoltaic industry; (2) The changes in market dynamics affect the dependence of enterprises on government subsidies; (3) The demand for government subsidies by enterprises gradually decreases with the increase of their own profits.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".