A multi-objective fuzzy flexible job shop scheduling problem considering the maximization of processing quality
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper analyzes practical production characteristics, including customer's stringent quality requirements and uncertain processing time in aircraft shaft parts manufacturing. Considering the above characteristics, we propose a multi-objective fuzzy aircraft shaft parts production scheduling problem considering the maximization of production quality. We define this problem as a multi-objective fuzzy flexible job shop scheduling problem (MO-fFJSP) with fuzzy processing time. To address this problem, we developed an improved multi-objective spider monkey optimization (IMOSMO) algorithm. IMOSMO integrates strategies such as genetic operators, variable neighborhood search and Pareto optimization theory on the framework of the conventional Spider Monkey Optimization (SMO) framework and discretize the continuous SMO algorithm to solve MO-fFJSP. To enhance the efficiency of the algorithm, we further adjust the sequence of the local leader learning phase and the global leader learning phase within the proposed IMOSMO framework. We conduct a comparative analysis between the performance of IMOSMO and NSGA-Ⅱ using 28 cases of varying scales. The computational results demonstrate the superiority of our algorithm over NSGA-Ⅱ in terms of both solution diversity and quality. Moreover, the performance of the proposed algorithm upgrades as the problem scale increases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it