Truck-drone joint path planning for post-disaster emergency material deployment considering fairness
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the expert gear of the emergency rescue system, drones are frequently utilized to distribute supplies following a calamity. The cost and effectiveness of rescue efforts as well as equitable distribution should be taken into account when allocating emergency supplies to disaster-affected areas. This work explores the emergency material allocation problem for truck-drone joint transportation with dynamic energy restrictions based on taking the fairness of emergency material allocation into consideration. In order to guarantee the equitable distribution of materials, the psychological stress experienced by the victims at each catastrophe site is measured using the relative deprivation cost. An adaptive large-scale neighborhood search method serves as the foundation for the creation of a two-stage heuristic algorithm, which reduces the overall cost of the system. The integer programming model MIP is built for this purpose. The research findings can serve as a useful guide for developing a just and effective emergency drone rescue system, and the testing results demonstrate the viability and effectiveness of the two-stage heuristic algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it