MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393140609 · doi:10.3390/plants13070940

Identification and Genetic Dissection of Resistance to Red Crown Rot Disease in a Diverse Soybean Germplasm Population

2024· article· en· W4393140609 on OpenAlexaff
Augustine Antwi-Boasiako, Shihao Jia, Jiale Liu, Na Guo, Changjun Chen, Benjamin Karikari, Jianying Feng, Tuanjie Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenuePlants · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersGovernment of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGermplasmBiologySingle-nucleotide polymorphismGeneticsCandidate geneLocus (genetics)GeneSNPGenetic diversityPlant disease resistanceGenetic architectureHaplotypePopulationGenome-wide association studyGenotypePhenotypeBotanyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Red crown rot (RCR) disease caused by Calonectria ilicicola negatively impacts soybean yield and quality. Unfortunately, the knowledge of the genetic architecture of RCR resistance in soybeans is limited. In this study, 299 diverse soybean accessions were used to explore their genetic diversity and resistance to RCR, and to mine for candidate genes via emergence rate (ER), survival rate (SR), and disease severity (DS) by a multi-locus random-SNP-effect mixed linear model of GWAS. All accessions had brown necrotic lesions on the primary root, with five genotypes identified as resistant. Nine single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers were detected to underlie RCR response (ER, SR, and DS). Two SNPs colocalized with at least two traits to form a haplotype block which possessed nine genes. Based on their annotation and the qRT-PCR, three genes, namely Glyma.08G074600, Glyma.08G074700, and Glyma.12G043600, are suggested to modulate soybean resistance to RCR. The findings from this study could serve as the foundation for breeding RCR-tolerant soybean varieties, and the candidate genes could be validated to deepen our understanding of soybean response to RCR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlantsSame topicPlant pathogens and resistance mechanismsFrench-language works237,207