Management of Extracurricular Activities at SMP Negeri 1 Wih Pesam Bener Meriah Regency
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this research is to describe the management of extracurricular activities at SMP Negeri 1 Wih Pesam, Bener Meriah Regency. This research uses a qualitative descriptive paradigm approach. Qualitative research is a research procedure that produces descriptive data in the form of written or spoken words from people who can be observed. In this research, the researcher tried to reveal and tell various forms of conditions, events and realities in the management of extracurricular activities at SMP Negeri 1 Wih Pesam, Bener Meriah Regency. The results of the research show that the planning for extracurricular activities that has been mutually agreed upon is very good because the school has involved all elements of the school, especially the head of student affairs, extracurricular supervisors, committees and parents by holding meetings to discuss the objectives of implementing extracurricular activities, scheduling extracurricular activities as well as the division of tasks and tasks. responsibilities of extracurricular supervisor teachers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it