Comparative assessment of energy costs of stacker crane movements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Within the framework of the put forward hypothesis that energy costs of working movements of the links of racking stacker cranes are inextricably linked to the shape of the working area of the warehouse in which the crane operates, to reduce energy costs, it was pro-posed to use a rotating boom in the design of the stacker crane. With the help of program implementations of mathematical models of stacker cranes of traditional bicycle design and the proposed design with a rotating boom, it became possible to determine the average energy costs for all possible movements of loads of the same mass within the corresponding working areas of these designs. For this purpose, systems of differential equations in Cauchy form were developed, where dissipation of energy was taken into account. The total value of work of crane drives during acceleration and braking was determined. The latter were carried out with constant accelerations, and the movement after acceleration — with constant speeds. The developed simulation mathematical models of cranes of traditional design and the proposed design with a rotating boom allow to determine the energy costs in the drives when moving the crane links along the given trajectories. According to the criterion of average total energy costs, adopted for all possible combinations of movements within areas of the same capacity of one hundred square meters, the stacker crane of the proposed design has an advantage over the crane of traditional design. This makes it possible to significantly reduce energy costs when using such cranes in warehouses and hangars. It is reasonable to recommend the use of a stacker crane of the developed design in warehouses of round shape — it will allow to reduce significantly the energy costs when using such cranes in warehouses and hangars.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".