Optimality conditions for nonconvex mathematical programming problems using weak subdifferentials and augmented normal cones
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we study some characterizations of the class of weakly subdifferentiable functions and formulate optimality conditions for nonconvex mathematical programming problems described by the class of weakly subdifferentiable functions in real normed spaces.The necessary and sufficient optimality conditions for a nonconvex scalar function with a global minimum/or a global maximum at a given vector via the weak subdifferentials and augmented normal cones are established.Additionally, the necessary and sufficient optimality conditions for a nonconvex vector function with a weakly efficient solution/or an efficient solution at a given vector via the augmented weak subdifferentials and normal cones are presented too.Finally, our optimality conditions are used to derive the necessary optimality conditions for nonsmooth nonconvex mathematical programming problems with set, inequality, and equality constraints.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it