Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anglophone economic geography has played a central role in the evolution of human geography. That includes economic geography's various philosophical and theoretical shifts as it moved from an imperialist commercial geography, through to regional economic geography, spatial science and location theory, Marxism, feminism, and poststructuralism. The discipline is now inordinately diverse, reflecting an enormous breadth of interests and approaches including the use of various quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Such diversity is a strength not a weakness given the disciplinary spirit of engaged pluralism. The field's unifying theme now is some form of geographical political economy – the idea that capitalism is an unstable, conflict‐ridden political economic system characterized by geographical uneven development, with its spatiotemporal evolution shaped by reciprocal relations between political–economic, cultural, and biophysical processes. Major current areas of research in anglophone economic geography include geographies of production and consumption, work and the body, high‐tech and the platform economy, governance and regulation, financialization, environment and economy, globalization and development, and diverse (more‐than‐capitalist) economies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".