MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393153966 · doi:10.21037/jphe-2023-apru-ab014

AB014. The disease burden, risk factors and temporal trends in breast cancer in low- and middle-income countries: a global study

2024· article· en· W4393153966 on OpenAlexaff
Mingjun Gao, Sofia Laila Wik, Qinyao Yu, Fanyu Xue, Sze Chai Chan, Shui Hang Chow, Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi, Claire Chenwen Zhong, Don Eliseo Lucero‐Prisno, Martin C. S. Wong, Junjie Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Public Health and Emergency · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerLow and middle income countriesMedicineBurden of diseaseEnvironmental healthDiseaseCancerDemographyDeveloping countryEconomicsEconomic growthInternal medicineSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Breast cancer poses a significant threat to women’s health and places a burden on healthcare systems worldwide. However, low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) often have insufficient breast cancer prevention, treatment, and understanding of risk factors. This study aims to investigate the disease burden, risk factors, and temporal trends of breast cancer specifically in LMICs. Methods: From 1990 to 2019, this study extracted incidence, prevalence, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and breast cancer risk factors from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) databases for 204 countries or territories. Temporal trends were examined using joinpoint regression analysis. Results: Among the income groups, the lower middle-income category had the highest DALYs value, with 1,787 years per 100,000 people. In the map analysis, 91% of African and Middle Eastern countries had age-standardized DALYs rates higher than the crude rate. LMICs countries collectively accounted for 74% of the global burden of DALYs lost due to breast cancer in 2019. Between 1990 and 2019, the prevalence of behavior-related risk factors for breast cancer increased by 47% in upper-middle income countries and 19% in low-income countries. However, it remained relatively consistent in lower-middle income countries. In lower-middle income countries, the risk associated with metabolic syndromes was higher compared to the risk associated with behavioral factors alone. For the recent past decade, breast cancer incidences increased significantly in lower-middle income countries [average annual percentage change (AAPC): 1.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.51–1.87, P<0.001], upper-middle income countries (AAPC: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.12–1.48, P<0.001), and low-income countries (AAPC: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.57–1.68, P<0.001). Conclusions: Breast cancer affects women globally, particularly in LMICs. This research shows how breast cancer in LMICs is aggravated by low resources and healthcare infrastructure. To successfully reduce breast cancer in these contexts, future studies must emphasize healthcare resource allocation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Public Health and EmergencySame topicGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningFrench-language works237,207