Native ants vary in their use of seeds from a recently introduced myrmecochorous exotic plant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Myrmecochory is a common mutualism between ants and plants benefiting both partners: ants obtain a nutrient-rich food source, while plants enjoy a host of benefits ranging from enhanced dispersal to protected germination sites. However, this mutualism can be exploited by invasive myrmecochores, where native ants spread invasive plant seeds, possibly to the detriment of native plant assemblages. With the recent introduction of a potentially invasive myrmecochorous plant (Thesium ramosum) in Alberta, Canada, we tested ant interest in T. ramosum. To evaluate both general interest in T. ramosum as a food source, and preference for T. ramosum over other food sources, we collected colonies of four commonly occurring native Formica species and conducted seed removal trials and food preference trials. We then evaluated interest in and preference for T. ramosum seeds through assessing mean rate of seed removal and food item removal, total number of seeds and food items removed, and trends in seed and food item removal through time. We found that while all ant species tested showed interest in T. ramosum, interest level varied among species, and additional factors such as colony size and presence of host species in socially parasitic species influenced interest in T. ramosum. Considering native ant interest in T. ramosum as a food source, it seems plausible that Formica species may act as a dispersal vector for T. ramosum, potentially enhancing its invasiveness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".