MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393156072 · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i2.27846

Spherical Pseudo-Cylindrical Representation for Omnidirectional Image Super-resolution

2024· article· en· W4393156072 on OpenAlexafffund
Qing Cai, Mu Li, Dongwei Ren, Jun Lyu, Haiyong Zheng, Junyu Dong, Yee‐Hong Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaUniversity of AlbertaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsOmnidirectional antennaRepresentation (politics)Resolution (logic)Image (mathematics)Computer visionComputer scienceArtificial intelligencePhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Omnidirectional images have attracted significant attention in recent years due to the rapid development of virtual reality technologies. Equirectangular projection (ERP), a naive form to store and transfer omnidirectional images, however, is challenging for existing two-dimensional (2D) image super-resolution (SR) methods due to its inhomogeneous distributed sampling density and distortion across latitude. In this paper, we make one of the first attempts to design a spherical pseudo-cylindrical representation, which not only allows pixels at different latitudes to adaptively adopt the best distinct sampling density but also is model-agnostic to most off-the-shelf SR methods, enhancing their performances. Specifically, we start by upsampling each latitude of the input ERP image and design a computationally tractable optimization algorithm to adaptively obtain a (sub)-optimal sampling density for each latitude of the ERP image. Addressing the distortion of ERP, we introduce a new viewport-based training loss based on the original 3D sphere format of the omnidirectional image, which inherently lacks distortion. Finally, we present a simple yet effective recursive progressive omnidirectional SR network to showcase the feasibility of our idea. The experimental results on public datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method as well as the consistently superior performance of our method over most state-of-the-art methods both quantitatively and qualitatively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial IntelligenceSame topicAdvanced Image Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207