MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393159733 · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i7.28576

PNeRFLoc: Visual Localization with Point-Based Neural Radiance Fields

2024· article· en· W4393159733 on OpenAlexaff
Boming Zhao, Luwei Yang, Mao Mao, Hujun Bao, Zhaopeng Cui

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRadianceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionPoint (geometry)Computer scienceArtificial neural networkMathematicsRemote sensingGeologyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the ability to synthesize high-quality novel views, Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) has been recently exploited to improve visual localization in a known environment. However, the existing methods mostly utilize NeRF for data augmentation to improve the regression model training, and their performances on novel viewpoints and appearances are still limited due to the lack of geometric constraints. In this paper, we propose a novel visual localization framework, i.e., PNeRFLoc, based on a unified point-based representation. On one hand, PNeRFLoc supports the initial pose estimation by matching 2D and 3D feature points as traditional structure-based methods; on the other hand, it also enables pose refinement with novel view synthesis using rendering-based optimization. Specifically, we propose a novel feature adaption module to close the gaps between the features for visual localization and neural rendering. To improve the efficacy and efficiency of neural rendering-based optimization, we also developed an efficient rendering-based framework with a warping loss function. Extensive experiments demonstrate that PNeRFLoc performs the best on the synthetic dataset when the 3D NeRF model can be well learned, and significantly outperforms all the NeRF-boosted localization methods with on-par SOTA performance on the real-world benchmark localization datasets. Project webpage: https://zju3dv.github.io/PNeRFLoc/.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial IntelligenceSame topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207