QLABGrad: A Hyperparameter-Free and Convergence-Guaranteed Scheme for Deep Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The learning rate is a critical hyperparameter for deep learning tasks since it determines the extent to which the model parameters are adjusted during the learning course. However, the choice of learning rates typically depends on empirical judgment, which may not result in satisfactory outcomes without intensive try-and-error experiments. In this study, we propose a novel learning rate adaptation scheme called QLABGrad. Without any user-specified hyperparameter, QLABGrad automatically determines the learning rate by optimizing the quadratic loss approximation-based (QLAB) function for a given gradient descent direction, where only one extra forward propagation is required. We theoretically prove the convergence of QLABGrad under the smooth Lipschitz condition on the loss function. Experiment results on multiple architectures, including MLP, CNN, and ResNet, on MNIST, CIFAR10, and ImageNet datasets, demonstrate that QLABGrad outperforms widely adopted schemes for deep learning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".