MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393168684 · doi:10.1002/ame2.12390

Message from animal models and experimental medicine for 2024—Striving for excellence with distinctive features

2024· editorial· en· W4393168684 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chuan Qin

Bibliographic record

VenueAnimal Models and Experimental Medicine · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal testing and alternatives
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExcellenceMedicineEngineering ethicsComputer sciencePsychologyEngineeringEpistemologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since its inception, Animal Models and Experimental Medicine (AMEM) has received 632 articles in total from 52 countries and regions including China, Iran, the United States, India, Nigeria, Israel, Germany, Iraq, Italy, Japan, Australia, Bangladesh, Belgium, Brazil, and Canada, among others. AMEM has become an important international exchange platform for innovative research achievements in the field of laboratory animal science and basic medicine. In 2023, we were pleased to see that the total number of published articles in AMEM reached 274, and the number of publications from international groups increased. And we hope that this proportion will continue to rise in the future. In 2023, based on maintaining high citation rates in the themed sections on neurodegenerative diseases and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, AMEM added three new international hot topics: multi-omics data analysis of animal models, usage of different tumor models in cancer research and the role of regulatory non-coding RNA in human diseases. In April 2023, a successful AMEM editorial board meeting was held in Taiyuan. During this meeting, the executive editor, associate editor, all the editorial board members and the editorial department actively exchanged views and contributed to the development of AMEM. At the meeting, I presented various awards to the editorial board members who had supported AMEM development from the very beginning, including the 2018–2020 AMEM Excellent Paper award, the Excellent Editorial Board Member award, the Excellent Reviewer award, the Publicity Ambassador award and the Outstanding Contribution Award for Editorial Board Members. AMEM appreciates the dedicated efforts of all editorial board members and hopes that we can work together in the new year to attain a brighter future. For AMEM, the key to standing out from the rest of the scientific journals lies in its distinctive features. Due to its integrating role at the intersection of cutting-edge technologies in the field of life sciences and pharmaceutical and healthcare, 2024 is a year full of challenges and opportunities for AMEM. AMEM will continue to play a leading role in the development of laboratory animal science, focusing its efforts on its advantageous and distinctive areas. We will further develop and strengthen the existing themes on brain science, stem cells, multi-omics data analysis of experimental animals, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, while at the same time welcoming unconventional contributions reporting original innovations, such as targeted drug prediction, brain-computer interfaces, and big data analysis. We seek to use these breakthroughs in medical innovation technologies as catalysts for leapfrogging the development of the journal. Developing AMEM themes with distinctive features is an ongoing effort and AMEM is committed to enriching the content of these themes by increasing the number of reviews, short communications and commentaries. As the editor-in-chief of AMEM, I encourage you to contribute to the themed sections of the journal and to provide suggestions to improve the development of the sections. With the added benefit of our efficient publishing services, we aim to make AMEM not only a platform for academic exchanges among scientists globally, but also an attractive arena for scientists to showcase their talents, inspirations and blue-sky thinking. At the beginning of the Lunar New Year, AMEM once again sincerely invites experts and colleagues from around the world to contribute to AMEM, to make it a hub for academic exchange and discussion. We also extend our thanks to the dedicated efforts of our editorial team throughout the past year and look forward to further collaboration to create outstanding achievements. As we start the new year, the AMEM editorial department will maintain a commitment to excellence and provide high-quality services to all authors and readers. At the same time, we also welcome and value feedback and suggestions from experts and colleagues globally to jointly promote the development of AMEM. Finally, we wish everyone a happy New Year and good health!

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.681
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnimal Models and Experimental MedicineSame topicAnimal testing and alternativesFrench-language works237,207