MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393170176 · doi:10.3934/math.2024558

Classes of completely monotone and Bernstein functions defined by convexity properties of their spectral measures

2024· article· en· W4393170176 on OpenAlexaff
Wissem Jedidi, Hristo S. Sendov, Shan Shen

Bibliographic record

VenueAIMS Mathematics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicApproximation Theory and Sequence Spaces
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvexityMonotone polygonMathematicsSpectral propertiesPure mathematicsMonotonic functionApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisPhysicsEconomicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We were interested in Bernstein and Lévy measures having certain convexity-type properties. The convexity-type properties were an extension of the harmonic convexity property considered in [ 9 ]. We characterized the corresponding completely monotone and Bernstein functions. We hope this paper can aid with understanding the analogous properties and open questions presented in [ 8 , 9 ].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIMS MathematicsSame topicApproximation Theory and Sequence SpacesFrench-language works237,207