Meningkatkan Kemampuan Eksplorasi Gerak Tari Dengan Metode Karya Wisata Pada Siswa Remaja Sanggar Tari Sekar Putri di Depok Jawa Barat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Siswa Sanggar Sekar Putri belum dapat melakukan eksplorasi gerak tari dengan baik. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan proses penerapan metode Karya Wisata untuk peningkatan kemampuan eksplorasi gerak tari serta untuk meningkatkan kemampuan siswa dalam kemampuan eksplorasi gerak tari. Penelitian dilakukan karena kemampuan ekaplorasi gerak siswa di sanggar Sekar Putri Depok rendah. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian tindakan dari Kemmis dan Mc Taggart dengan penerapan metode pembelajaran Karya Wisata. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan 2 siklus. Setiap siklus terdiri dari 4 tahap, yaitu perencanaan,tindakan, pengamatan, dan refleksi. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik observasi, wawancara, dan tes. Penelitian melibatkan kolaborator untuk melakukan penilaian dan evaluasi hasil dari metode Karya Wisata untuk meningkatkan kemampuan eksplroasi gerak tari. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan metode Karya Wisata dapat meningkatkan kemampuan eksplorasi gerak tari pada siswa remaja berdasarkan hasil nilai pra- siklus 49,8, siklus I meningkat menjadi 65,9, dan siklus II menjadi 81,2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.037 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".