MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Opportunistic Mobile Crowdsensing for Interference Overhead Reduction and Throughput Maximization

2023· article· en· W4393186448 on OpenAlexaff
Mozhang Guo, Xianbin Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrowdsensingComputer scienceOverhead (engineering)ThroughputReduction (mathematics)Computer networkInterference (communication)Mobile telephonyMobile radioWirelessTelecommunicationsComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate onsite interference information acquisition is essential for the successful deployment of a millimetre wave (mmWave) empowered 5G Small Cell (SC) networks, given the sensitivity of signal quality to interference caused by the significant attenuation of high-frequency signals. Opportunistic mobile crowdsensing (OCS) arises as a cost-effective technology for onsite interference sensing, which schedules communication opportunities of mobile devices to perform sensing tasks. However, conventional OCS methods follow a routine schedule for updating interference levels for each user at fixed time intervals. This approach leads to unnecessary sensing overhead and degrades system performance. In this study, we utilize the interference spatial correlation to reduce the sensing frequency and devise a novel low-overhead situation-dependent OCS scheme in the indoor location-aware SC communication system. Specifically, we schedule a subset of users to perform interference sensing and leverage interference spatial correlation to predict the interference conditions of adjacent users, thus reducing the sensing overhead. Then, we jointly optimize the OCS sensing scheduling and communication time allocation to maximize the throughput of all users. Considering the non-convex challenge presented in the formulated problem, the sequential convex approximation (SCA) and block coordinate descent (BCD) methods are proposed to solve this problem efficiently. Through extensive simulation analysis, our novel low-complexity algorithm demonstrates superior performance compared to other baseline methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.518

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Crowdsensing and CrowdsourcingFrench-language works237,207