MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Response to Referee #1

2024· peer-review· en· W4393187244 on OpenAlexaffabout
Leiming Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicSports Analytics and Performance
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<strong class="journal-contentHeaderColor">Abstract.</strong> This study investigates long-term trends of criteria air pollutants, including NO<sub>2</sub>, CO, SO<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>3</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and (NO<sub>2</sub>+O<sub>3</sub>) measured in ten Canadian cities during the last two to three decades and associated driving forces in terms of emission reductions, perturbations from varying weather conditions and large-scale wildfires, and changes in O<sub>3</sub> sources and sinks. Two machine-learning methods, including random forest algorithm and boosted regression trees, were used to extract deweathered mixing ratios (or mass concentrations) of the pollutants. The Mann-Kendall analysis of the deweathered and original annual average concentrations of the pollutants showed that, on the time scale of 20 years or longer, the perturbation from varying weather conditions exerted a very minor influence on the decadal trends of original annual averages (within &plusmn;2 %) in ~70 % of the cases, and a moderate influence up to 16 % of the original trends in the other 30 % cases. NO<sub>2</sub>, CO and SO<sub>2</sub> showed decreasing trends in the last two to three decades in all the cities except CO in Montreal. O<sub>3</sub> showed increasing trends in all the cities, except Halifax, mainly due to weakened titration reaction between O<sub>3</sub> and NO. (NO<sub>2</sub>+O<sub>3</sub>), however, showed decreasing trends in all the cities, except Victoria, because the increase in O<sub>3</sub> is much less than the decrease in NO<sub>2</sub>. In three of the five eastern Canadian cities, emission reductions dominated the decreasing trends in PM<sub>2.5</sub>, but no significant trends in PM<sub>2.5</sub> were observed in the other two cites. In five western Canadian cities, increasing or no significant trends in PM<sub>2.5</sub> were observed, likely due to unpredictable large-scale wildfires overwhelming or balancing the impacts of emission reductions on PM<sub>2.5</sub>. In addition, despite improving air quality during the last two decades in most cities, air quality health index of above 10 (representing very high-risk condition) still occasionally occurred after 2010 in western Canadian cities because of the increased large-scale wildfires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.042

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSports Analytics and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207