Recent record of True Giant Clam Tridacna gigas from the Sulu Archipelago and insight into the giant clam fisheries and conservation in the southernmost islands of the Philippines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Philippines is a hotspot for marine biodiversity, particularly for giant clams like Tridacna gigas. Despite protective measures, giant clams are threatened with extinction due to overharvesting and habitat loss. We conducted a rapid documentation of a rampant giant clam fishery and trade we discovered in Panggungan Island in Sitangkai, Tawi-Tawi during our assessment, following a ship grounding incident in the area. We observed numerous empty shells of various giant clam species scattered across the area, indicating active harvesting by the community. The locals sell the meat, either fresh or dried and pearls collected from giant clams. The local community culture live with giant clams, including the true giant clam species, Tridacna gigas, along the shorelines. The largest live T. gigas individual we documented had a shell length of about 60 cm. Our study provides the first documentation of wild adult T. gigas in the Sulu Archipelago. It is also the only report of sighting of wild adult T. gigas aside from Palawan. Furthermore, our study marks the first account of giant clam trade within the Philippines since the early 1980s when the government issued a total ban on catching and selling of all species giant clams. Our findings highlight the critical need for a thorough assessment of T. gigas and other giant clam species in the biodiversity-rich Sulu Archipelago. Effective conservation of giant clams and the surrounding reefs will ensure the future of our marine ecosystems and the communities that rely on them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".