Practical 10‐Color T‐Cell Panel for Phenotyping Diverse Populations Using Spectral Flow Cytometry: A Beginner's Guide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Flow cytometry stands as the most employed high‐throughput single‐cell analysis technique, facilitating the profiling of remarkably diverse samples, such as blood, bone marrow and body fluids. In addition, it allows for the discrimination of diverse immune cell subsets, including infrequently encountered types like T regulatory cells and exhausted CD28Null T cells. However, analyzing rare immune cell subsets with conventional flow cytometry poses challenges stemming from factors like fluorophore overlap, compensation issues, and limited flexibility in fluorophore selection. Therefore, spectral flow cytometry offers advantages over traditional flow cytometry. It measures the full emission spectrum and then separates it to identify different fluorochromes. This enables the use of fluorochromes with significant overlap in a single test, allowing for the analysis of more protein markers. Following this, spectral technology employs precise calculations to separate individual fluorochromes, thereby enabling the detection and elimination of autofluorescent signals originating from cells within the entire emission spectrum. This capability is pivotal in achieving deep phenotyping of immune cells with the requisite sensitivity and resolution essential for monitoring the immune systems of patients with compromised immunity, such as cancer and autoimmune disorders. Additionally, it allows for the exploration of interactions between distinct immune subsets. In this context, we introduce an optimized protocol utilizing spectral flow cytometry for precise T‐cell characterization and differentiation, encompassing the assessment of their activation states. Furthermore, this protocol extends its applicability to the identification of less common circulating T‐cell populations, notably T‐regulatory and CD28Null T cells, following autofluorescence correction within the spectrum. This protocol provides a set of steps and reagents for the surface and intracellular staining of human T cells using whole peripheral blood. The spectral‐based design of this panel allows for its applicability to other spectral machines, providing a versatile and efficient tool for T‐cell analysis. © 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Achieving optimal staining through effective antibody titration Basic Protocol 2: Single‐cell staining Basic Protocol 3: Comprehensive panel staining post‐titration and spectral library integration
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.049 | 0.058 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".