MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393193489 · doi:10.1002/cpz1.1020

Practical 10‐Color T‐Cell Panel for Phenotyping Diverse Populations Using Spectral Flow Cytometry: A Beginner's Guide

2024· article· en· W4393193489 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Protocols · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlow cytometryCytometryImmune systemComputational biologyContext (archaeology)BiologyMultiplexFluorophoreMass cytometryImmunologyComputer scienceBioinformaticsPhenotypeGeneticsPhysicsFluorescence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Flow cytometry stands as the most employed high‐throughput single‐cell analysis technique, facilitating the profiling of remarkably diverse samples, such as blood, bone marrow and body fluids. In addition, it allows for the discrimination of diverse immune cell subsets, including infrequently encountered types like T regulatory cells and exhausted CD28 Null T cells. However, analyzing rare immune cell subsets with conventional flow cytometry poses challenges stemming from factors like fluorophore overlap, compensation issues, and limited flexibility in fluorophore selection. Therefore, spectral flow cytometry offers advantages over traditional flow cytometry. It measures the full emission spectrum and then separates it to identify different fluorochromes. This enables the use of fluorochromes with significant overlap in a single test, allowing for the analysis of more protein markers. Following this, spectral technology employs precise calculations to separate individual fluorochromes, thereby enabling the detection and elimination of autofluorescent signals originating from cells within the entire emission spectrum. This capability is pivotal in achieving deep phenotyping of immune cells with the requisite sensitivity and resolution essential for monitoring the immune systems of patients with compromised immunity, such as cancer and autoimmune disorders. Additionally, it allows for the exploration of interactions between distinct immune subsets. In this context, we introduce an optimized protocol utilizing spectral flow cytometry for precise T‐cell characterization and differentiation, encompassing the assessment of their activation states. Furthermore, this protocol extends its applicability to the identification of less common circulating T‐cell populations, notably T‐regulatory and CD28 Null T cells, following autofluorescence correction within the spectrum. This protocol provides a set of steps and reagents for the surface and intracellular staining of human T cells using whole peripheral blood. The spectral‐based design of this panel allows for its applicability to other spectral machines, providing a versatile and efficient tool for T‐cell analysis. © 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1 : Achieving optimal staining through effective antibody titration Basic Protocol 2 : Single‐cell staining Basic Protocol 3 : Comprehensive panel staining post‐titration and spectral library integration

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score0.865

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.249
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it