Utility and effectiveness of ankle-foot orthoses in individuals with hemiparesis: a literature review on cerebral palsy and stroke
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AMA Piwowar-Kuczyńska B, Zabojszcz M, Urbaniak M, Trąbka R, Curyło M. Utility and effectiveness of ankle-foot orthoses in individuals with hemiparesis: a literature review on cerebral palsy and stroke. Physiotherapy Review. 2024;28(1):5-12. doi:10.5114/phr.2024.136483. APA Piwowar-Kuczyńska, B., Zabojszcz, M., Urbaniak, M., Trąbka, R., & Curyło, M. (2024). Utility and effectiveness of ankle-foot orthoses in individuals with hemiparesis: a literature review on cerebral palsy and stroke. Physiotherapy Review, 28(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.5114/phr.2024.136483 Chicago Piwowar-Kuczyńska, Bernadeta Faustyna, Michał Zabojszcz, Monika Urbaniak, Rafał Trąbka, and Mateusz Curyło. 2024. "Utility and effectiveness of ankle-foot orthoses in individuals with hemiparesis: a literature review on cerebral palsy and stroke". Physiotherapy Review 28 (1): 5-12. doi:10.5114/phr.2024.136483. Harvard Piwowar-Kuczyńska, B., Zabojszcz, M., Urbaniak, M., Trąbka, R., and Curyło, M. (2024). Utility and effectiveness of ankle-foot orthoses in individuals with hemiparesis: a literature review on cerebral palsy and stroke. Physiotherapy Review, 28(1), pp.5-12. https://doi.org/10.5114/phr.2024.136483 MLA Piwowar-Kuczyńska, Bernadeta Faustyna et al. "Utility and effectiveness of ankle-foot orthoses in individuals with hemiparesis: a literature review on cerebral palsy and stroke." Physiotherapy Review, vol. 28, no. 1, 2024, pp. 5-12. doi:10.5114/phr.2024.136483. Vancouver Piwowar-Kuczyńska B, Zabojszcz M, Urbaniak M, Trąbka R, Curyło M. Utility and effectiveness of ankle-foot orthoses in individuals with hemiparesis: a literature review on cerebral palsy and stroke. Physiotherapy Review. 2024;28(1):5-12. doi:10.5114/phr.2024.136483.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it