Simulation of Groundwater Quality in Xi 'an,Shaanxi Province Based on Visual Modflow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The so-called groundwater quality simulation is to study the spatial and temporal variation law of the concentration of a certain soluble substance (element or other component) when it is dispersed and transported by simulation method, to predict the instantaneous dynamics and expansion range of polluted groundwater, and to provide scientific basis for formulating reasonable and effective prevention measures. In recent years, the environmental hydrogeology survey results of some provinces, cities and regions in China show that the groundwater in most cities in China has been polluted to varying degrees. This situation directly affects industrial and agricultural production and people's health. However, in the past, environmental hydrogeology work was mostly limited to surface investigation, lacking quantitative and predictive evaluation research. Monitoring groundwater quality dynamics and forecasting the development trend of groundwater pollution is one of the main tasks of groundwater pollution investigation and research. Relevant information shows that some countries in the world have already carried out this research and established a predictive groundwater quality model. Among them, the United States has established 22 material transport models and 5 heat transport models; France has established 5 models of material transport and 4 models of heat transport. The following countries have only established material transport models: 7 in Israel; 2 in the UK; 2 in Canada; 1 in West Germany and 1 in Japan. Therefore, we believe that the study of groundwater quality simulation experiment, which is still blank in China's scientific field, has become an important subject that needs to be carried out urgently to ensure the four modernizations and people's health. The hydrogeological conditions and dynamic characteristics of groundwater resources have been comprehensively analyzed and studied. It points out that the continuous exploitation of groundwater resources in 2018 has led to the deterioration of groundwater quality, land degradation, underground, cracks and depletion of groundwater resources, and puts forward some preventive measures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".