Modeling sediment concentrations and loads for two small agricultural watersheds in Prince-Edward-Island (Canada): present conditions and a future scenario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The degradation of soils and its detrimental consequences on aquatic environments is an important research topic in agricultural regions such as Prince Edward Island (PEI, Canada). Enhanced information related to suspended sediments in watercourses can serve as an effective decision-making tool in agricultural land management. This study aims to compare flow, suspended sediment concentrations (SSC), and loads using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) in two watersheds in Prince Edward Island (PEI). The final investigations will focus on the potential variations in hydrological and sedimentary values in the future using a relatively pessimistic climate change scenario. Finally, the projected sediment concentrations and loads will be analyzed, considering their potential impacts on ecosystems. Water level and turbidity were recorded using two water level loggers and two optical backscatter sensors (OBS) deployed in the Tuplin Creek and Spring Valley watersheds. These instruments continuously recorded suspended sediments and flow data from June 2021 to September 2022. The data were used to manually calibrate the hydrological and suspended sediment models. The understanding of sediment loads and the benefits of proposed changes to agricultural practices can be tested with the SWAT model, as it incorporates a land use index that varies spatially and temporally. Calibration and validation of both the hydrological and sediment models were satisfactory, with Kling-Gupta Efficiency coefficients varying between 0.51 and 0.73 and Nash-Sutcliffe coefficients varying between 0.61 and 0.73 respectively, indicating successful simulation of both variables in an agricultural context in spite of relatively short calibration and validation periods. Under the selected climate change scenario (RCP 8.5), daily flows and suspended sediment concentrations were simulated until 2,100, showing a slight increase in the average suspended sediment concentration (CSS). For Tuplin Creek, extremely high sediment peaks (>1,500 mg/L) could become significantly more frequent, potentially causing more frequent and severe ecosystem disturbances according to the simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".