MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393200069 · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-44512-4

Polygenic risk score for ulcerative colitis predicts immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis

2024· review· en· W4393200069 on OpenAlexafffund
Pooja Middha, Rohit Thummalapalli, Michael J. Betti, Lydia Yao, Zoe Quandt, Karmugi Balaratnam, Cosmin A. Bejan, Eduardo Cárdenas, Christina J. Falcon, David M. Faleck, Natasha B. Leighl, Penelope A. Bradbury, Frances A. Shepherd, Adrian G. Sacher, Lawson Eng, Matthew A. Gubens, Scott Huntsman, Douglas B. Johnson, Linda Kachuri, Khaleeq Khan, Min Li, Christine M. Lovly, Megan H. Murray, Devalben Patel, Kristin Werking, Yaomin Xu, Luna Jia Zhan, Justin M. Balko, Geoffrey Liu, Melinda C. Aldrich, Adam J. Schoenfeld, Elad Ziv

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of General Medical SciencesVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Human Genome Research InstituteMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterVanderbilt UniversityVanderbilt University Medical CenterEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentPrincess Margaret Cancer FoundationNational Center for Research ResourcesGeorgia Clinical and Translational Science AllianceLarry L. Hillblom Foundation
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineUlcerative colitisAdverse effectMeta-analysisGastroenterologyColitisColorectal cancerCancerCohortOncologyImmune systemLung cancerDiseaseImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated colitis (IMC) is a common adverse event of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We hypothesize that genetic susceptibility to Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) predisposes to IMC. In this study, we first develop a polygenic risk scores for CD (PRS CD ) and UC (PRS UC ) in cancer-free individuals and then test these PRSs on IMC in a cohort of 1316 patients with ICI-treated non-small cell lung cancer and perform a replication in 873 ICI-treated pan-cancer patients. In a meta-analysis, the PRS UC predicts all-grade IMC (OR meta =1.35 per standard deviation [SD], 95% CI = 1.12–1.64, P = 2×10 −03 ) and severe IMC (OR meta =1.49 per SD, 95% CI = 1.18–1.88, P = 9×10 −04 ). PRS CD is not associated with IMC. Furthermore, PRS UC predicts severe IMC among patients treated with combination ICIs (OR meta =2.20 per SD, 95% CI = 1.07–4.53, P = 0.03). Overall, PRS UC can identify patients receiving ICI at risk of developing IMC and may be useful to monitor patients and improve patient outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.005
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207