MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393200219 · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02233-6

The multimodality cell segmentation challenge: toward universal solutions

2024· article· en· W4393200219 on OpenAlexafffund
Jun Ma, Ronald Xie, Shamini Ayyadhury, Cheng Ge, Anubha Gupta, Ritu Gupta, Song Gu, Yao Zhang, Gihun Lee, Joonkee Kim, Wei Lou, Haofeng Li, Eric Upschulte, Timo Dickscheid, José Guilherme de Almeida, Yixin Wang, Lin Han, Xin Yang, Marco Labagnara, Vojislav Gligorovski, Maxime Scheder, Sahand Jamal Rahi, Carly Kempster, Alice Y. Pollitt, Léon Espinosa, Tâm Mignot, Jan Moritz Middeke, Jan‐Niklas Eckardt, Wangkai Li, Zhaoyang Li, Xiaochen Cai, Bizhe Bai, Noah F. Greenwald, David Van Valen, Erin Weisbart, Beth A. Cimini, T. Cheung, Oscar Brück, Gary D. Bader, Bo Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Methods · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell Image Analysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstitutePrincess Margaret Cancer CentreCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchVector InstituteSinai Health SystemUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchNational Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in ResearchCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaScience and Engineering Research BoardNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaForschungszentrum JülichAlliance de recherche numérique du CanadaSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungIndraprastha Institute of Information Technology, DelhiDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftBritish Heart Foundation
KeywordsSegmentationBenchmark (surveying)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceImage segmentationMultimodalityScale-space segmentationSegmentation-based object categorizationPattern recognition (psychology)Computer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0040.010
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations142
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature MethodsSame topicCell Image Analysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207