L’espace filmique abject : Naked Lunch et A History of Violence de David Cronenberg
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cette étude consacrée à Naked Lunch (Burroughs, 1959 ; Cronenberg, 1991) et A History of Violence (Wagner et Locke, 2005 ; Cronenberg, 2005), je propose d’articuler les notions d’image-espace (Gaudin, 2014) et de corps filmique (Shaviro, 1994) afin de montrer que ces transcréation de David Cronenberg ont un impact corporel et engendrent des sensations culpabilisantes pour le public – soit l’anempathie (dans le premier exemple) et l’excitation extrême (dans le second). À travers mes analyses de ces films « infilmables » qui empruntent un certain nombre de sèmes abjects à leurs hypotextes, je désire non seulement rendre compte de leurs effets sur notre corps mais aussi expliquer le rôle que jouent les différentes composantes du médium filmique (monstration certes mais aussi cadrage et bande sonore) pour l’élaboration d’un paysage filmique abject. J’argue que le réalisateur torontois, à la fois source de fascination et de haine si l’on en croit ce qui a été écrit à son sujet, propose une nouvelle forme de cinéma qui, par le truchement de l’abjection, pave la voie pour la libération de notre imaginaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".