A New <i>ToxA</i> Haplotype in the Wheat Fungal Pathogen <i>Bipolaris sorokiniana</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The necrotrophic effector ToxA is a well-studied virulence factor produced by several fungal necrotrophs. Initially cloned from the wheat tan spot pathogen Pyrenophora tritici-repentis in 1996, ToxA was found almost a decade later in another fungal pathogen, Parastagonospora nodorum, and its sister species, Parastagonospora pseudonodorum. In 2018, ToxA was detected in a third wheat fungal pathogenic species, Bipolaris sorokiniana, which causes spot blotch disease. However, unlike the case with P. tritici-repentis and P. nodorum, the ToxA in B. sorokiniana has only been investigated in recent years. In this report, five Australian B. sorokiniana isolates were assessed for the presence of ToxA. Four isolates were found to contain ToxA. While one isolate harbored the previously reported ToxA haplotype sequence ( ToxA19), three isolates contain a different haplotype, designated herein as ToxA25, which has a nonsynonymous mutation resulting in an amino acid change of glycine to arginine at position 168. Both B. sorokiniana ToxA isoforms, when heterologously expressed in Escherichia coli, exhibited the classic ToxA necrosis-inducing activity on ToxA-sensitive Tsn1 cultivars. Preliminary analysis of the B. sorokiniana isolates in Australian wheat cultivars showed that isolates with ToxA19, ToxA25, or ToxA-deficient displayed various degrees of virulence, with the most aggressive isolates observed for those producing ToxA. Differences in spot blotch disease severity between Tsn1 and tsn1 cultivars were observed; however, this was not limited to the ToxA-producing isolates. The overall results suggest that the virulence of the Australian B. sorokiniana isolates is diverse, with the significance of ToxA− Tsn1 interactions depending on individual isolates. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".