MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Migration of transition metals and potential for carbon mineralization during acid leaching of processed kimberlite from Venetia diamond mine, South Africa

2024· article· en· W4393203167 on OpenAlexafffund
Baolin Wang, Nina Zeyen, Sasha Wilson, Makoto Honda-McNeil, Jessica Hamilton, Konstantin von Gunten, Daniel S. Alessi, Thomas Ray Jones, David Paterson, Gordon Southam

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Geochemistry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Resources CanadaDe Beers GroupNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsKimberliteMineralization (soil science)GeochemistryLeaching (pedology)GeologyDiamondMineralogyEarth scienceMantle (geology)MetallurgySoil scienceSoil waterMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbonation of mafic and ultramafic rocks and mineral wastes provides a permanent way to sequester excess atmospheric CO2. Recent research has shown that this method also offers the potential for enhanced recovery of critical metals from mine tailings. In this study, processed kimberlite from the Venetia diamond mine (South Africa) was used in column acid leaching experiments to assess both its carbonation potential and whether critical metals such as nickel could be recovered during mineral carbonation. Processed kimberlite was treated daily with one pore volume of either deionized water or dilute hydrochloric acid (0.04 M, 0.08 M, 0.12 M and 0.16 M) for 28 days. Iron-rich yellow precipitates consistent with yellow ground formed during the experiments both at the top of the residue columns (corresponding to the inlets of the columns) and within the leachates collected from the bases of columns. The carbonation potential and mobility of transition metals were investigated using a combination of quantitative X-ray diffraction (XRD) using Rietveld refinements, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXS), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) coupled with EDXS, and synchrotron-based X-ray fluorescence microscopy (XFM). Our results show that the high proportion of clay minerals (e.g., lizardite, smectite, talc, chlorite) in the processed kimberlite act as the primary source for Mg and transition metals such as Ni; however, calcite dissolution is the main source for Ca. The amount of Mg and Ca extracted from processed kimberlite increases with HCl concentration. If acid leaching of processed kimberlite were used at Venetia, the amount of Mg leached from clay minerals would provide an estimated CO2 offset potential ranging from 2.1 to 15.8 % of the mine's total annual emissions. The leached Ca from silicate dissolution could also provide an estimated CO2 offset potential ranging from 2.1 to 8.1 % of the mine's total annual emissions. However, the amount of CO2 released by calcite dissolution during this process is equivalent to 2.1–14.3 % of total annual CO2 emissions at Venetia., thus resulting in a net estimated CO2 offset potential of 2.1–9.6 % if the Ca released from calcite could not be recarbonated. If all of the Ca could be reprecipitated as calcite, the acid leaching techniques employed in this study could offset 4.2–23.9 % of the Venetia mine's CO2 emissions. Ultimately, greater concentrations and/or amounts of acid may be used to access more of the offset potential of Mg phyllosilicates in kimberlite, but the CO2 released by calcite dissolution must also be won back by recarbonation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied GeochemistrySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207