MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393203344 · doi:10.1016/j.pss.2024.105891

Optical polarization studies of latex beads in aqueous solution: An analog for radar scattering in icy regolith

2024· article· en· W4393203344 on OpenAlexafffund
Antoine Bourget, Parvathy Prem, D. T. Blewett, M. G. Daly, I. B. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenuePlanetary and Space Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersYork UniversityNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsRegolithPolarization (electrochemistry)Materials scienceAqueous solutionScatteringRadarAstrobiologyOpticsPhysicsChemistryAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents low phase angle 0°–5° measurements of polarimetric properties of icy planetary regolith analog materials acquired using the custom-built Multi-Axis- Goniometer-Instrument (MAGI). We present same sense (SC), and opposite sense (OC) backscatter circular polarization coefficients, circular polarization ratio (CPR), and degree linear polarization (DLP) of spherical latex (non-dye) beads of varying sizes and volume concentrations (v/v) in aqueous solutions (λ=0.8μm) in water. We also present measurements of alumina powder in air at λ=1.064μm. Measurements showed that at a low incidence angle (i=0°), backscatter is dominated by surface specular single-bounce scattering, that hides other scattering processes. At high (i=15°) incidence angle, surface single-bounce surface scattering becomes negligible, allowing for the detection of diffuse, dihedral (multiple bounces) scattering. We find that classical Mie alumina particles (2.1μm,4.0μm) enhance subsurface scattering due to a larger void space relative to larger Mie particles (30μm), that cause the radar signal to scatter forward off small imperfections, maintaining the polarization properties of the signal and generating high >1 CPR. Latex beads, representing impurities, demonstrate the impact of isotropic and anisotropic scattering on radar signatures. This study also found that the scattering medium’s anisotropy correlates to the size of the beads, while the void space of the medium inversely correlates with the bead size and the volume concentration (v/v) of the beads. Rayleigh beads, due to isotropic scattering from the reduced scattering cross-section and higher transparency relative to larger impurities, generate subsurface single bounce scattering from the sample platform, producing OC≫SC and a low (<0.5) CPR across all v/v. Rayleigh impurities in transparent water-ice simulate single bounce scattering from underlying layers. Conversely, classical and large Mie beads generate anisotropic scattering that intensifies scattering in the forward direction with high CPR, inversely proportional to the volume concentration. This study aids in interpreting radar observations of icy bodies in the solar system, providing insights into the interplay between radar waves and icy regolith compositions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlanetary and Space ScienceSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207