KONSEP HUKUM PROGRESIF DALAM PEMERINTAHAN DAERAH
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstrak Hukum progresif adalah hukum yang hidup dan berkembang, yang didukung peran aktif baik masyarakat maupun aparatur pemerintahan yang tidak hanya mampu mendengarkan suara hati rakyat tetapi juga aparatur pemerintahan yang berani dan menjalankan hukum dan pemerintahan tidak hanya dengan logikanya akan tetapi juga dengan menggunakan kecerdasan spiritualnya. Dari adanya suatu konsep hukum progresif diharapkan terwujud suatu pemerintahan daerah yang didukung dengan aparatur pemerintahannya yang mampu dan mau mendengarkan suara hati rakyatnya. Dengan penerapan hukum progresif dalam pemerintahan di daerah sebagai suatu gagasan diharapkan mampu mendukung pelaksanaan otonomi daerah sehingga tercapai kebahagiaan, keamanan, ketertiban, serta kesejahteraan bagi masyarakat. Kata Kunci : Hukum Progresif, Pemerintah, Otonomi Daerah Abstract Progressive law is a law that lives and develops, which is supported by the active role of both the community and government officials who are not only able to listen to the voices of the people's hearts but also government officials who are brave and run the law and government not only with logic but also by using their spiritual intelligence. From the existence of a progressive legal concept, it is hoped that a regional government will be supported by government officials who are able and willing to listen to the voices of the people's hearts. With the application of progressive law in regional government as an idea, it is hoped that it will be able to support the implementation of regional autonomy so that happiness, security, order and welfare for the community are achieved. Keywords: Progressive Law, Government, Regional Autonomy
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it