MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393210282 · doi:10.1016/j.radcr.2024.02.101

Primary intramedullary extradural Ewing sarcoma

2024· article· en· W4393210282 on OpenAlexaff
Alameen Damer, Leslie Hamilton, Albert Tu, Donna L. Johnston, Raveena Ramphal, Nagwa Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiology Case Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSarcomaEwing's sarcomaRadiologySurgeryChemotherapyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ewing sarcoma is the second most frequent primary bone tumour of childhood and adolescence. The aim of this report is to describe the imaging, pathology, clinical findings, and treatment of a primary intradural extramedullary Ewing sarcoma with a unique intracranial metastatic component in a pediatric patient. A 14-year-old girl with a history of mood disorders presented to the emergency department with a 3-week history of neck torticollis, cervical pain, paresis, and paresthesia of the upper and lower extremities on the left side. Initially, non-organic causes such as somatization or conversion disorder were suspected. She returned 3 months later when her symptoms worsened. MRI of the head and spine was performed, and demonstrated the presence of a suprasellar, retro-chiasmatic mass lesion. There was also diffuse leptomeningeal enhancement, another well-defined intradural extramedullary lesion the sacral region and several multifocal cauda equina soft tissue nodules. The patient first underwent surgery. The patient was also treated with a combination of chemotherapy (vincristine, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide alternating with ifosfamide and etoposide (VDC/IE)) and radiation as per the Children's Oncology Group AEWS1221 protocol. Most recent imaging conducted 22 months after the initial mass discovery revealed improvement of the suprasellar mass lesion with residual stable appearance of the prominence and enhancement of the pituitary stalk and tuber cinereum. There was interval improvement of the spinal lesions with no convincing residual. Clinically, at almost three years since initial imaging findings, and 25 months since completing treatment, she is stable from an oncology perspective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadiology Case ReportsSame topicSarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207