The Development and Effectiveness of an Integrative Cognitive Rehabilitation Program for Persons with Schizophrenia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research and development study aimed to develop and test the effectiveness of an integrative cognitive rehabilitation program for persons with schizophrenia. The study consisted of four main steps. The first step was situation analysis of cognitive impairment and treatment for persons with schizophrenia. Relevant documents and focus group interviews with schizophrenic patients, caregivers, healthcare providers and experts were collected for the content analysis. These findings were used to establish a first draft program in the second step. Content validity was tested, with an Index of Item-Objective Congruence of 0.77. The second draft program was developed by adjusting the first draft, and then was pilot tested and adjusted again to become the third draft. In the third step, the third draft was tested for its effectiveness on cognition, attention, memory, executive functions, and personal and social performance in 32 persons with schizophrenia. Outcome measures were the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, the Attention Assessments, Thai Cognitive-Perceptual Test, the Loewenstien Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment, and the Personal and Social Performance Scale -Thai version. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, two-way ANOVA, paired t-test, Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn’s test, and two-way repeated measures ANOVA. The last step involved evaluation of the third draft after effectiveness testing, and program adjustment for the final program. The program comprised 15 daily, 60-minute group sessions. The experimental group had significantly higher post-intervention scores of cognition, auditory memory, and executive functions from the baseline; and had significantly higher executive functions than the control group. The experimental group had significantly higher scores of personal and social performance from the baseline to weeks 4 and 12 follow-up; and higher than the control group at weeks 4 and 12.The findings support the utility of a program in cognitive rehabilitation and relapse prevention for persons with schizophrenia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".