Automatic Regenerative Simulation via Non-Reversible Simulated Tempering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Simulated Tempering (ST) is an MCMC algorithm for complex target distributions that operates on a path between the target and a more amenable reference distribution. Crucially, if the reference enables i.i.d. sampling, ST is regenerative and can be parallelized across independent tours. However, the difficulty of tuning ST has hindered its widespread adoption. In this work, we develop a simple nonreversible ST (NRST) algorithm, a general theoretical analysis of ST, and an automated tuning procedure for ST. A core contribution that arises from the analysis is a novel performance metric—Tour Effectiveness (TE)—that controls the asymptotic variance of estimates from ST for bounded test functions. We use the TE to show that NRST dominates its reversible counterpart. We then develop an automated tuning procedure for NRST algorithms that targets the TE while minimizing computational cost. This procedure enables straightforward integration of NRST into existing probabilistic programming languages. We provide extensive experimental evidence that our tuning scheme improves the performance and robustness of NRST algorithms on a diverse set of probabilistic models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".