MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4393224100 · doi:10.1522/revueot.v33n1.1718

impact de la transition numérique sur l’entrepreneuriat informel des femmes commerçantes à Libreville au Gabon

2024· article· fr· W4393224100 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Serge Francis Simen, Ursule Nudy Banzoussi Niaka, Yao Agbeno, Mireille-Laure Beyala Mvindi, Steve Paterne Nkoulou

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue Organisations & territoires · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article examine l’impact de la transition numérique sur l’entrepreneuriat informel des femmes commerçantes à Libreville, au Gabon, et sur leur autonomisation économique. Utilisant une approche qualitative exploratoire et s’appuyant sur des entretiens semi-directifs avec des commerçantes de Libreville ainsi que divers acteurs (ONG, etc.), l’étude révèle que la transition numérique présente des opportunités, notamment en matière d’accès à l’information et aux services financiers ainsi que de renforcement des réseaux sociaux et du capital humain. Néanmoins, elle met également en évidence des défis significatifs, tels que l’accès limité aux technologies, des compétences numériques insuffisantes ainsi que l’existence de normes sociales et culturelles contraignantes. Des stratégies d’adaptation et de résilience élaborées par les femmes commerçantes pour faire face à ces obstacles sont identifiées. Ces constatations suggèrent des directions pour les décideurs politiques, les gestionnaires et les organisations désireux de soutenir l’entrepreneuriat féminin dans le cadre d’une numérisation en expansion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.198

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue Organisations & territoires→Same topicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences→French-language works237,207→