MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393224140 · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2334124

Investigating How Older Korean Immigrants Construct Meaning With a Companion Robot: A Narrative Analysis of User Experiences

2024· article· en· W4393224140 on OpenAlexaff
Othelia EunKyoung Lee, Eunjung Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSocial Robot Interaction and HRI
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNarrativeConstruct (python library)Meaning (existential)ImmigrationNarrative inquirySociologyPsychologyComputer scienceHistoryArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In light of the effects of cultural differences, language barriers, limited social networks on Korean American older immigrants, we investigate their utilization of companion robots as a potential remedy to tackle the issue of social isolation. Subsequently, we detail our research approach, encompassing participants, environments, analytical framework, the viewpoints of the researchers, and the research procedure. Our results demonstrate how older adults shape stories that result in the emergence of a companion robot named Hyodol as a quasi-human entity. We conclude by discussing how older immigrants attribute personal significance to having the companion robot as a “meaningful other,” and how they imbue the concept of “active aging” as socially significant, and as such, actively engage with the companion robot. We also address the study’s limitations and propose future research avenues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Human-Computer InteractionSame topicSocial Robot Interaction and HRIFrench-language works237,207