Plasticity of repetitive sequences demonstrated by the complete mitochondrial genome of Eucalyptus camaldulensis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The tree Eucalyptus camaldulensis is a ubiquitous member of the Eucalyptus genus, which includes several hundred species. Despite the extensive sequencing and assembly of nuclear genomes from various eucalypts, the genus has only one fully annotated and complete mitochondrial genome (mitogenome). Plant mitochondria are characterized by dynamic genomic rearrangements, facilitated by repeat content, a feature that has hindered the assembly of plant mitogenomes. This complexity is evident in the paucity of available mitogenomes. This study, to the best of our knowledge, presents the first E. camaldulensis mitogenome. Our findings suggest the presence of multiple isomeric forms of the E. camaldulensis mitogenome and provide novel insights into minor rearrangements triggered by nested repeat sequences. A comparative sequence analysis of the E. camaldulensis and E. grandis mitogenomes unveils evolutionary changes between the two genomes. A significant divergence is the evolution of a large repeat sequence, which may have contributed to the differences observed between the two genomes. The largest repeat sequences in the E. camaldulensis mitogenome align well with significant yet unexplained structural variations in the E. grandis mitogenome, highlighting the adaptability of repeat sequences in plant mitogenomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".