MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393226961 · doi:10.2217/fnl-2023-0024

Focusing on earlier diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease

2024· article· en· W4393226961 on OpenAlexaff
Kristian Steen Frederiksen, Xavier Morató, Henrik Zetterberg, Serge Gauthier, Merçé Boada, Vanesa Pytel, Julie Hahn-Pedersen, Luis Rafael Solís Tarazona, Soeren Mattke

Bibliographic record

VenueFuture Neurology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNovo Nordisk
KeywordsDiseaseDementiaMedicineCognitive impairmentPsychological interventionQuality of life (healthcare)Alzheimer's diseaseMemory clinicCognitionIntensive care medicineGerontologyPsychologyPsychiatryPathologyNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is considered a continuum, progressing from preclinical disease to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) as an early stage, before reaching clinically apparent dementia. Although it is difficult to assess the potential impairments in performance of patients with MCI due to AD, this condition should be diagnosed as early as possible so that, by means of early interventions, patients can maintain their quality of life longer. Healthcare systems should support primary care physicians in their effort to identify patients with MCI due to AD and refer patients to memory clinics and specialists who can provide a reliable diagnosis and initiate appropriate disease management. This review discusses the benefits of earlier AD diagnosis, along with potential challenges and future directions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFuture NeurologySame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207