Emerging Growth Inducers And Bioagent During The Seedling Of Chickpea Against Fusarium Oxysporum f. sp. ciceri
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this present study, studies on chickpea wilt using of different chemical inducers and bio-control agents the Fusarium oxysprum f. sp. ciceri. The use of chemical inducers in PD broth media and pro-tray amended (SA, OA and AA) with concentrations (100 and 200 ppm). Use of plant defense inducers is a newer approach and can prove to be a beneficial alternative and therefore this study was conducted to know the efficacy of chemical inducers and bio control agents. The experiments were conducted in both in vitro as well as in portray method. The result revealed that maximum growth of bio-agent was recorded (30.60 mm) in T1 while the pathogen growth (40.73 mm) and mycelial percent inhibition (38.89%) in T1. In T. viride maximum wet weight of fungal mat was recorded in T10 (9.25 g) in case of T. harzianum was shown in T8 (6.16 g). The maximum dry weight of T. viride fungal mat was found in T2 (2.05 g) and in case of T. harzianum (1.79 g). Tested chemical inducers and bioagents on poo-tray method after ten days of sowing, the maximum average number of healthy seedlings were recorded in T2 (27.00).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".