MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4393236743 · doi:10.1016/j.cor.2024.106632

Arrival and service time dependencies in the single- and multi-visit selective traveling salesman problem

2024· article· en· W4393236743 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputers & Operations Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
FundersMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónEuropean Regional Development FundMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
KeywordsTravelling salesman problemComputer scienceService (business)Traveling purchaser problemOperations researchMathematical optimizationBottleneck traveling salesman problemMathematicsAlgorithmBusinessMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyze several time dependency issues for the selective traveling salesman problem with time-dependent profits. Specifically, we consider the case in which the profit collected at a vertex depends on the service time, understood as the time spent at this vertex, and when the service time at each vertex depends on the arrival time at the vertex. For each of these two cases, we formulate two continuous-time problems: (i) a vertex can be visited at most once, and (ii) vertices may be visited more than once. In each case, we consider general profit functions at the vertices, i.e., the profit functions are not limited to monotonic functions of time. We also formulate the problems as discrete-time problems using appropriate variants of an auxiliary time-extended graph, and we solve them with Gurobi. We apply our methodology to two sets of instances. First, we use a set of artificial instances to illustrate the main differences amongst the different versions of the problem. We then solve several instances adapted from TSPLIB to evaluate the computational capabilities of the methodology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score0.634

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it