Impaired autophagy following ex vivo cooling of simulated hypothermic temperatures in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from young and older adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypothermia is a critical consequence of extreme cold exposure that increases the risk of cold-related injury and death in humans. While the initiation of cytoprotective mechanisms including the process of autophagy and the heat shock response (HSR) is crucial to cellular survival during periods of stress, age-related decrements in these systems may underlie cold-induced cellular vulnerability in older adults. Moreover, whether potential sex-related differences in autophagic regulation influence the human cold stress response remain unknown. We evaluated the effect of age and sex on mechanisms of cytoprotection (autophagy and the HSR) and cellular stress (apoptotic signaling and the acute inflammatory response) during ex vivo hypothermic cooling. Venous blood samples from 20 healthy young (10 females; mean [SD]: 22 [2] years) and 20 healthy older (10 females; 66 [5] years) adults were either isolated immediately (baseline) for peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) or exposed to water bath temperatures maintained at 37, 35, 33, 31, or 4 °C for 90 min before PBMC isolation. Proteins associated with autophagy, apoptosis, the HSR, and inflammation were analyzed via Western blotting. Indicators of autophagic initiation and signaling (LC3, ULK1, and beclin-2) and the HSR (HSP90 and HSP70) increased when exposed to hypothermic temperatures in young and older adults (all p ≤ 0.007). Sex-related differences were only observed with autophagic initiation (ULK1; p = 0.015). However, despite increases in autophagic initiators ULK1 and beclin-2 (all p < 0.001), this was paralleled by autophagic dysfunction (increased p62) in all groups (all p < 0.001). Further, apoptotic (cleaved-caspase-3) and inflammatory (IL-6 and TNF-α) signaling increased in all groups (all p < 0.001). We demonstrated that exposure to hypothermic conditions is associated with autophagic dysfunction, irrespective of age or sex, although there may exist innate sex-related differences in cytoprotection in response to cold exposure as evidenced through altered autophagic initiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".