Effect of thermal and defatting treatments on the composition, protein profile and structure of house cricket (Acheta domesticus) protein extracts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigated the impact of blanching (100 °C, 40 s), defatting method (maceration, Soxhlet) and solvent polarity (hexane, ethanol) on the profile, structure and solubility of house cricket protein extracts. Blanching and Soxhlet using ethanol impacted the protein profile, with a lower content of myosin heavy chain and a higher abundance of low molecular weight proteins (<25 kDa). Moreover, ethanol induced aggregation of non-blanched cricket proteins, with a 13-72% reduction in protein recovery yield. The protein secondary structure of non-blanched extracts was also affected by ethanol with 18% more β-sheets. Furthermore, blanching resulted in a lower protein surface hydrophobicity by a factor of 3 to 7, with no impact of solvent polarity. Finally, the solubility of protein extracts remained >75%, regardless of the blanching and defatting methods. These findings, combined with the evaluation of techno-functional properties, could be used for the development of cricket-based protein ingredients for food formulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".